Sep 12 2009 01:09 PM ET

Toronto: Getting high on 'Up in the Air'

George-Clooney-Up-Air_lHere are a few of the kinds of movies I wish that Hollywood made a lot more often (or maybe even two or three times a year): a romantic comedy that’s not just about situations but behavior, with two flawed and fascinating adults trying to figure out how to act around each other; a movie that connects to a large audience because it taps, in a rich and bold and immediate way, into the fears and anxieties of our time; a comedy in which the dialogue pings with wit and imagination and verve, yet without calling too much attention to itself (so that it doesn’t make your teeth hurt the way that Duplicity did); a movie that keeps surprising you because its characters keep surprising themselves.

tiff_iconThe beauty of Up in the Air, the new film directed by Jason Reitman (Juno), is that it’s all those things at once. It’s also an indelibly personal movie. Adapted from a novel by Walter Kirn, Up in the Air nevertheless carries a pronounced link to Reitman’s first film, Thank You For Smoking (which premiered at Toronto in 2005), with its prankishly subversive tobacco-lobbyist hero. Only now Reitman is working with the polish of a master. In this new one, George Clooney plays a very similar kind of scoundrel, an executive efficiency expert whose entire job consists of jetting from one city to the next, planting himself in offices, and doing the dirty work of downsizing employees, telling each one, face to face, with a kind of eerie empathic dispassion, that they’re being let go, and that opportunities await, it’s really a beginning not an ending, here’s your severence packet, and blah blah blah. (He’s also a part-time motivational speaker, pepping up the very sorts of people he fires.)

This is not a job for anyone except a man who keeps his compassion firmly under control. Yet the most defining characteristic of Clooney’s Ryan Bingham is that he lives, quite literally, on the road, and loves it. He’s got a dozen passkeys to a dozen luxury VIP lounges, boutique rent-a-car deals, and high-end cookie-cutter hotels, and the fascination of the character is that since all of these corporate accomodations are essentially the same place, he really is at home in each one of them. He’s a pure product of the new America, an addict for an existence in which everything has become systematized. He’s also an addict for frequent-flyer miles, which he regards with an almost poetic, rather than just economic, aspiration (he’s out to collect a magically large number of them). Up in the air, or down on the ground, he’s quite happy being unattached to anyone or anything.

If anyone but George Clooney had played Ryan, we might not believe in (or like) him. But Clooney, with his cracklingly smart and debonair yet maybe slightly too polished surface, knows here, as he did in Michael Clayton, how to play a rogue who may be losing his soul but, in the eyes of the audience, holds on to it anyway. This is movie-star acting of the sort that no else today can bring off.

The “interviews” Ryan does with the folks he fires give you a chill. Reitman shuffles them, documentary-style, into montages of anger, confusion, righteousness, and naked terror, and I suspect that audiences will watch these sequences feeling as if the rug is being pulled out from under them (or could be). They’re a full-on vision of what’s going on in the country today, and Up in the Air is the rare movie that does justice to economic desperation by expressing it with an honest populist embrace. But even though Ryan is a messenger of doom, he’s no villain; no one in the movie is. Not even the fresh-faced corporate chipmunk (Anna Kendrick) who gets hired on at Ryan’s firm, and comes up with the “advanced” notion of doing away with their traveling-axman system, so that the firings, instead, can just take place over the Internet.

Suddenly, Ryan’s method looks positively benign, but since the airplane-happy Ryan also doesn’t want his lifestyle to end, he takes this naive young shill out on the road and shows her how downsizing with humanity is done. Kendrick is a fast-talking delight (she keeps showing you more layers), but there isn’t meant to be any romantic spark to their sparring. Ryan saves that for Alex, his sexy counterpart in corporate travel — and a role that, at long last, gives Vera Farmiga the chance to show off the sharp-eyed sensuality that makes her irresistable; she’s the homespun vixen next door. Clooney and Farmiga are fantastic together — Cary Grant and Rosalind Russell for the PowerPoint age. Up in the Air is light and dark, hilarious and tragic, bouncy and brainy, romantic and real. It’s everything that Hollywood has forgotten how to do, but we’re blessed that Jason Reitman has remembered it.

***

Clooney, a major presence in Toronto this year, also stars in The Men Who Stare at Goats. As one of the founding members of a crackpot military unit, he wears a mustache that makes him look like Dennis Farina, and he does his best to act cool, calm, and collected, which sets him in contrast to all the flakes and hysterics around him. The Men Who Stare at Goats is one of those over-the-top absurdist antiwar “satires” that inevitably gets compared to Dr. Strangelove, though a better comparison might be the fractious, madcap-incoherent film version of Catch-22. This new movie was directed by Grant Heslov (his first effort since Good Night, and Good Luck, his earlier collaboration with Clooney), but in this case “directed” is a charitable word. Telling the tall tale of a battalion of New Age paranormal soldiers who were trained, during Vietnam, to don cloaks of invisibility, kill goats with their minds, and generally turn war into a groovy thing, Heslov slaps gags together and never even begins to find a point of view. Performers like Jeff Bridges (in a ponytail) and Kevin Spacey (in the worst hairpiece of his career) show up and jabber as if locked in their own private acting classes, and Ewan McGregor, as the reporter who tags along with Clooney when the troop is revived to help fight the war in Iraq (see, it’s a topical movie!), looks about as lost as I felt. The audience I saw The Men Who Stare at Goats with ate it up, but I thought it was borderline unwatchable — a magical-realist sitcom war farce that ends up being about nothing but its own slovenly smugness.

Comments (1-15) of 16 Add your comment

Page:
  • diane

    clooney is very over rated. if he spews one more so called witty quip im gonna puke.

  • Keil Shults

    Clooney can be a bit much in certain films and interviews, but you gotta respect the guy for not simply taking the obvious parts continually thrown at men considered megastars/heartthrobs. I admire his sense of humor, his willingness to look silly or even simple in a role, and performances like Michael Clayton make it evident that he has genuine acting chops. With a good script and a talented director he’s usually rather enjoyable. He’s certainly come a long way from The Peacemaker.

  • Bobbie

    I enjoy George Clooneys films most of the time,like in Out Of Site, Three Kings ,Goodnight and good luck, and in Michael Clayton, I think he is one of our best actors.But I will say that the whole” Cary Grant I am so witty and polished”screen persona is getting a little tired. I’d like to see him in something completely different and risky ,just to change it up again,because if you don’t continue to change and create new things, it becomes the same thing over and over again. But again , great actor, just needs a little more variety film wise.

  • marilyn

    Wow! All I have to say is somebody will need the jaws of life to extricate Owen Gleiberman from Clooney’s a$$. Just ask the man for a date already and stop trying to woo him with your sycophantic reviews!

  • lindsey

    Seriously, can’t you dial it down just a little? We know EW worships Clooney, but this review is just ridiculous.

  • Karl Leschinsky

    Wow some of the comments here are stupid. At build a case for your opinion like Owen has so thoughtfully… From what I can see, another excellent review from one half of the dynamic EW duo. I agree that Clooney’s casting is what seems to make this movie work, alongside Reitman’s direction and a timely, original script. Of course, all I’ve seen is the trailer and Ryan’s monologue about ‘how much your life weighs’ and packing all you own and everybody you know into it, that we die if we stop moving, that we’re sharks, not swans. It’s one of the more intriguing trailers this year. Reitman seems to have done wonders with the visuals. That computer image of North America and the people on it all connected by red lines until you can’t see anything, that’s a beauty. And, again, Clooney seems to be the perfect choice because he exudes, as Owen said, a suave that’s a little bit too polished to be completely real… Can’t wait til this hits theaters (unless I can sneak it in somehow before TIFF is over… very difficult to get tix to).

    • Karl Leschinsky

      *At least* build a case…

  • Karl Leschinsky

    *packing everybody you know into a bag* sorry
    (don’t have the luxury of editors)

  • Tim

    Whatever. All I see is a message board full of fat,lazy morons ranting about how George Clooney is overrated. Yawn. Yeah, no he’s really not. As a matter of fact of leading Hollywood men I’d be hard pressed to name another “heartthrob” who takes half as many chances (Good Night and Good Luck, Michael Clayton, O Brother Where Art Thou, Three Kings, Out of Sight, etc.), is so willing to look vulnerable and downright stupid or who makes movies that are not imminently watchable. It takes an adult to sit through Michael Clayton which, most of you, clearly aren’t. The old, timeworn yarn about Clooney being overrated is tired. And hopefully it will be blown away by this movie just like the stupid trite about Quentin Tarantino being an overrated director was blown away by Inglorious Basterds.

    • snoopy

      are you a fat, lazy, moronic poster criticizing others for their opinions, which they’re entitled to have? huh? please enlighten us on that, as we’re waiting….

  • Liza Strauss

    Give it up, this guy has a great sense of humor, funny and a great smile. I would like to see him more in comedy, a silly romantic comedy movie would be excellent.

  • Rosella

    George Clooney is a brilliant actor, and he deserves some respect.

    • fancypants

      he’s good, sometimes great, but not brilliant. Daniel Day-Lewis, Denzel Washington and Tom Hanks are brillaint (all 2x oscar winners, BTW). Clooney is not quite at their level. Case in point: Clooney rarely disappears into character. When you watch Clooney in a film, you’re very aware that you’re watching Clooney act as opposed to watching a character behave.

      • billby

        Tom Hanks, brillant? far from it. And Denzel Washington, who I liked a lot, seems to have some problems to choose good scripts. George Clooney happens to be a great, great actor with great taste when it happens to choose his films.

  • theodosia

    this is a review of a specific film and the actor’s performance. i don’t get the post that doesn’t have anything to do with it. i mean the movie’s great and the actor did a great job but why do you have to bring other actors in it to bring it down? each actor has their own thing. do you think this movie would work w/ daniel day lewis, denzel washington, or tom hanks in it?

  • Lisa

    LOVE GEORGE!!!
    I think his best role was ‘Doug’ in ER. I also loved ONE FINE DAY!

Page:

Add your comment

The rules: Keep it clean, and stay on the subject - or we may delete your comment. If you see inappropriate language, e-mail us. An asterisk (*) indicates a required field.

When you click on the "Post Comment" button above to submit your comments, you are indicating your acceptance of and are agreeing to the Terms of Service. You can also read our Privacy Policy.
Advertisement
Powered by WordPress.com VIP